Wednesday, January 28, 2026

How to Win Deals When You’re Not the Highest Bidder

 

How to Buy a Business Without the Highest Offer: 8 Ways to Beat Competing Buyers

What happens when you find a business you want to buy, but another buyer has more money than you?

Maybe you're competing against a private equity firm with deep pockets. Perhaps another buyer is using an SBA loan to finance 90% of the acquisition. Or someone simply offers a purchase price you can't justify based on the business's cash flow.

Does that mean you've lost the deal?

Not necessarily.

In my years working as a business broker, I handled four situations where multiple buyers were competing to purchase the same business.

In three of those four situations, the seller did not choose the highest offer.

The buyers who won weren't necessarily the wealthiest. They were the ones who made the sellers feel more confident about the transaction and what would happen to the business afterward.

That's an important distinction.

When you're buying a small business, you're not simply competing on price. You're competing on credibility, deal structure, certainty of closing, and your ability to become a successful successor to the current owner.

And if you understand what sellers are really worried about, you can make a more compelling offer without putting yourself in a dangerous financial position.

Let's talk about how to do that.


Why the Highest Offer Doesn't Always Win When Buying a Business

A few weeks ago, I published a video discussing the Renovo private equity roll-up situation.

In that video, I asked whether viewers wanted to learn how an individual business buyer could compete against private equity firms and other well-funded buyers.

A number of people said yes.

So let's examine the problem.

Private equity firms often have access to substantial investor capital. They may also be able to borrow money on more favorable terms than an individual buyer.

That gives them certain advantages.

They may be willing to offer a higher price because they believe they can improve the business, combine it with other operations, or generate additional growth.

For an individual buyer, that can be frustrating.

You've done your homework.

You've studied the company's financial statements.

You've calculated what the business can reasonably afford in acquisition debt.

And then someone comes along and offers significantly more.

It's tempting to increase your offer just to remain competitive.

But that can be a serious mistake.

The objective isn't to win the bidding competition. It's to acquire a business that will still make financial sense after you own it.

And fortunately, sellers often care about much more than the headline purchase price.

What Business Sellers Really Want From a Buyer

When someone decides to sell their business, they're taking a risk.

They may have spent twenty or thirty years building the company.

They've developed customer relationships, hired employees, established systems, and created something that supports their family.

Now they're preparing to transfer ownership.

But the process between accepting an offer and completing the sale can be complicated.

During due diligence, sensitive information may be shared.

Employees may become concerned about their future.

Important customers could hear that the business is for sale.

And if the transaction collapses, the seller may be left with a disrupted business.

I've seen situations where problems during due diligence caused an owner to withdraw from a transaction and spend another year or two rebuilding the business before attempting another sale.

That's especially difficult when the owner has a pressing reason to exit.

They may be experiencing burnout, boredom, fatigue, poor health, divorce, relocation, or an approaching retirement.

They want to move on.

They don't want to spend another two years fixing problems created by an unsuccessful transaction.

That's why sellers evaluate more than the purchase price.

They also consider the likelihood of closing, the terms of payment, the buyer's qualifications, and what the buyer intends to do with the company.

Three Categories of Seller Goals

In my Exit Ready program, I encourage business owners to think about their goals before beginning the sale process.

Those goals generally fall into three categories.

1. Financial goals

How much money does the seller need from the transaction?

Will the proceeds support their retirement?

Are they concerned about running out of money?

Would receiving payments over time help them meet their financial objectives?

2. Business goals

What should happen to the company after the sale?

Will employees keep their jobs?

Will the business continue operating in the same location?

Will the new owner preserve the company's reputation and customer relationships?

3. Community goals

Does the business support local organizations, charities, schools, or community projects?

Does the seller want those commitments to continue?

For example, imagine a company that supports a lunch program at a local elementary school.

That contribution costs money.

A buyer who pays an extremely high purchase price may need to cut discretionary spending to generate an acceptable return or service acquisition debt.

The seller may realize that the highest offer could threaten the community commitments they've maintained for years.

Not every seller cares about these things.

Some owners are primarily motivated by receiving the highest possible price.

But many sellers want a successor who will preserve what they've built.

And that creates an opportunity for a buyer who doesn't have the largest budget.

Why Sellers Worry About the Risk of a Business Sale

To make a competitive offer, you need to understand what the seller fears.

Some of those concerns relate to the transaction itself.

Others relate to what happens after closing.

Common seller concerns include:

  • The buyer's financing falling apart before closing

  • The buyer reducing the purchase price during due diligence

  • A lengthy due diligence process that disrupts operations

  • An inexperienced buyer who cannot complete the acquisition

  • Losing employees or important customers during the transaction

  • The buyer failing to make future seller-financing payments

  • The company's employees, reputation, or community commitments being neglected after closing

A higher offer doesn't necessarily solve any of these problems.

In some cases, it can make them worse.

For example, a buyer offering an unusually high multiple of EBITDA may be relying on aggressive growth assumptions.

The seller may wonder whether that buyer can actually finance the acquisition or operate the company successfully.

A thoughtful buyer can address these concerns directly.

And that's where the real competition begins.

A Real Example: The Lowest Offer Won With 50% Seller Financing

Let me share a situation from my business brokerage days.

I was representing a building materials company.

We received three competing offers.

The highest offer came from someone who had relatively little relevant experience.

They had never worked in construction or building materials.

The second offer came from an accountant.

This person had extensive experience working with businesses in different industries, but their professional background was primarily in public accounting.

The third offer came from someone with a very different background.

He had grown up in a family where his father was a general contractor.

As a teenager, he worked on construction sites and learned how houses were built.

Later, he studied business.

He then started his own company as a licensee representing a well-known product across a territory.

He built that business through machinery sales and recurring revenue associated with supplying those machines.

Eventually, he sold it.

Now he wanted to buy the building materials company.

Why the Seller Chose the Third Buyer

The seller considered all three offers.

The first buyer offered the most money.

The accountant had strong professional qualifications.

But the third buyer understood the industry.

He knew construction.

He understood the customers.

He had demonstrated sales ability.

And he'd already built and sold a business.

The seller believed this person could successfully operate the company.

So who won?

The third buyer, who submitted the lowest-priced offer.

And here's what makes the example especially interesting.

His offer included 50% seller financing.

That meant the seller wasn't simply accepting less money.

The seller was also agreeing to receive a substantial portion of the purchase price over time.

Why would someone do that?

Because they trusted the buyer's ability to operate the business and make the payments.

The buyer's credibility helped overcome both a lower price and a significant seller-financing requirement.

That's a powerful lesson for anyone trying to acquire a small business.

You don't always need to offer more money.

Sometimes you need to demonstrate that you're the person most likely to make the business successful.

Strategy 1: Build Credibility Before Making Your Offer

If you're competing against buyers with more money, credibility becomes one of your strongest advantages.

The seller needs to believe you understand the business.

They need confidence that you can manage employees, maintain customer relationships, and generate enough cash flow to meet your obligations.

That confidence comes from demonstrating relevant experience.

Perhaps you've worked in the industry for years.

Maybe you've managed a similar operation.

You might have experience in sales, operations, financial management, or leading employees.

Or perhaps you've successfully operated another business with similar characteristics.

The important thing is connecting your experience to the seller's company.

Don't simply tell the seller that you're hardworking and passionate.

Explain how your background prepares you to run the business.

Show that you understand the challenges.

Ask informed questions.

Demonstrate that you've thought about the transition.

And make sure the financial terms of your offer reflect what the business can realistically support.

As I explain:

"You're not competing on money. You're competing on credibility" —David C. Barnett

A seller who believes in your ability may view your offer as less risky than a higher offer from someone who doesn't understand the industry.

Strategy 2: Discover What the Seller Actually Wants

Here's another important principle.

Buying a business is a lot like selling.

You're selling the owner an opportunity to exit.

And just like a good salesperson, you need to understand the other person's needs before presenting a solution.

Imagine walking into a car dealership.

You tell the salesperson you need a vehicle.

And they immediately point to a car and say it costs $25,000.

Wouldn't that seem strange?

They haven't asked whether you have children.

They don't know whether you commute to work.

They haven't asked whether you need to tow a trailer or carry equipment.

They know nothing about your budget.

A good salesperson asks questions first.

Then they recommend something that fits your circumstances.

The same approach applies when buying a business.

Questions to Ask a Business Seller

Before submitting your offer, try to understand the seller's priorities.

You might ask:

  • Why are you considering selling now?

  • What would an ideal transition look like?

  • How important is it that existing employees remain with the company?

  • Do you want the business to continue operating in this community?

  • Are there customer relationships or community commitments you particularly want preserved?

  • Would you prefer receiving the entire purchase price at closing, or would payments over time be useful?

  • What concerns you most about selling the company?

  • What kind of buyer do you believe would be most successful operating this business?

These conversations can reveal opportunities that aren't obvious from the financial statements.

For example, a seller may be deeply concerned about employees losing their jobs.

If you can demonstrate that your acquisition plan preserves those jobs, that may distinguish your offer.

Or perhaps the seller is worried about retiring and managing a large investment portfolio.

A well-structured seller note might provide an income stream that appeals to them.

The point is to understand the seller's situation before deciding how to structure your proposal.

Strategy 3: Make Your Financing More Certain

One of the biggest concerns sellers have is whether a buyer can actually complete the transaction.

A buyer may offer an attractive purchase price but need a bank to approve the financing.

That introduces uncertainty.

The bank may reject the loan.

An appraisal may come in below expectations.

The lender may require additional equity.

Or the approval process may take longer than anticipated.

A buyer who has already secured the necessary funds may offer greater certainty of closing.

Can You Make an Offer Without Business Acquisition Financing?

In some circumstances, buyers may have access to financing that isn't directly dependent on the business being purchased.

For example, they might use financing secured against other assets, such as a home equity line of credit.

Other buyers may have accumulated substantial savings or arranged funding through other sources.

The advantage is that the transaction may not depend on obtaining a new business acquisition loan.

However, this doesn't mean borrowing against your home or other personal assets is automatically a good idea.

That creates a different type of risk.

You still need to evaluate the cost of financing, your personal exposure, and the cash flow available to repay the debt.

The objective is to reduce uncertainty without taking on financial obligations you cannot reasonably support.

Strategy 4: Use Seller Financing to Address Retirement Concerns

Seller financing can be an important tool when buying a small business.

Instead of receiving the entire purchase price at closing, the seller agrees to finance part of the acquisition.

The buyer makes payments over an agreed period.

This can reduce the buyer's need for outside financing.

It can also keep the seller financially interested in the business's success.

But seller financing may offer another advantage.

It can help address the seller's retirement concerns.

Turning a Business Sale Into an Income Stream

Imagine a seller who is worried about investing a large lump sum after retirement.

They're concerned about market volatility.

They wonder whether their savings will last.

You might propose a substantial seller-financing note with an attractive interest rate.

For example, I discuss a hypothetical arrangement involving an 11% interest rate over ten years.

That could provide the seller with a predictable schedule of payments rather than requiring them to immediately invest all the proceeds elsewhere.

In effect, you're presenting the seller with a way to convert business ownership into a continuing income stream.

But there's an important distinction.

A seller-financing note isn't a guaranteed retirement annuity.

The seller is taking credit risk.

If the buyer fails to operate the business successfully, the seller may not receive all the promised payments.

That's why your experience, financial contribution, business plan, and proposed security arrangements matter.

The seller needs to believe the payments are reasonably secure.

And you need to ensure the interest rate and repayment schedule are affordable.

A structure that appeals to the seller but leaves the buyer unable to service the debt isn't a successful deal.

Strategy 5: Offer a More Efficient Due Diligence Process

Some sellers are afraid of lengthy due diligence.

They've heard stories about buyers requesting endless documents, asking repetitive questions, and keeping transactions open for months.

They're also concerned about buyers who submit attractive offers and then attempt to renegotiate the price after gaining access to the company's information.

This is sometimes called retrading.

For example, a buyer might initially offer five times EBITDA.

Then, near the end of due diligence, they announce that they can only pay 3.9 times EBITDA.

The seller has already invested months in the process.

They're emotionally exhausted.

And now they face the possibility of starting over.

That can create pressure to accept the reduced price.

How an Individual Buyer Can Offer More Certainty

If you want to stand out, demonstrate that your due diligence process will be organized and efficient.

Explain what information you need.

Show that you understand the business's financial statements.

Avoid unnecessary requests.

Establish a realistic timetable.

And make sure your initial offer is based on assumptions you can support.

In some circumstances, you may be able to offer a shorter due diligence period or fewer contingencies.

But be careful.

You should never eliminate essential due diligence simply to win a deal.

Due diligence exists to protect you from risks you may not discover until after closing.

One possible alternative is to negotiate a transaction structure that provides protection against certain post-closing problems.

For example, a larger seller note might include carefully drafted rights of offset for specified claims or breaches.

These provisions require appropriate legal drafting and negotiation.

The seller may also demand limits, security, or other protections.

The important point is that you can sometimes address the seller's desire for a simpler process through thoughtful deal structure rather than abandoning your own risk management.

Strategy 6: Show How You'll Protect Employees and the Seller's Legacy

Many business owners care deeply about what happens to their employees after the sale.

Some have worked with the same people for decades.

They may also be concerned about the company's role in the community.

A private equity firm or strategic buyer may have opportunities to consolidate operations.

For example, they might eliminate administrative positions and move those functions to a regional office several hours away.

That could improve profitability.

But it might also mean layoffs in the seller's community.

An individual buyer may be able to offer something different.

You can present a plan that maintains the existing workforce and continues the company's traditional operations.

Put the Numbers Behind Your Promises

Simply promising to protect employees isn't enough.

You need to demonstrate that your acquisition plan can support those commitments.

Prepare a cash flow forecast showing the business's expected revenue, operating expenses, acquisition debt payments, employee costs, and remaining cash flow.

If you intend to maintain community sponsorships, include those costs too.

This allows you to show the seller how your proposed purchase price supports the business's ongoing obligations.

And it creates an interesting comparison.

Suppose another buyer offers 40% more than you.

The seller may begin wondering how that buyer intends to make the numbers work.

Will they eliminate jobs?

Cut community spending?

Increase prices?

Or are they simply making an offer based on overly optimistic projections?

You don't need to accuse competing buyers of planning these things.

You can let your own financial analysis demonstrate what is realistically affordable.

That's often more persuasive than making unsupported claims about the competition.

Strategy 7: Make a Defensible Offer Instead of an Emotional One

Competitive situations can create emotional pressure.

You find a business you like.

You imagine yourself owning it.

You begin making plans.

Then another buyer enters the picture.

Suddenly, the process feels like an auction.

You start thinking about what you need to offer to win.

But this is where buyers get into trouble.

I've told the story before about my son, who, when he was very young, thought the objective of an auction was simply to keep bidding higher than everyone else.

But buying a business isn't about winning an auction.

It's about making an investment that works.

Let the Business's Cash Flow Determine Your Offer

Your purchase price needs to reflect the business's ability to generate sustainable cash flow.

That means accounting for operating expenses, necessary capital expenditures, working capital, debt service, and other financial obligations.

You also need to consider whether the business can support the compensation you require.

If the numbers only support a certain purchase price, don't ignore that conclusion because someone else offers more.

Instead, explain your reasoning.

Show the seller your assumptions.

Demonstrate how your offer allows the business to continue operating successfully.

And explain why taking on more debt would put the business under unnecessary pressure.

This can actually strengthen your credibility.

A seller may respect someone who understands the financial limitations of the business.

And if another buyer makes a substantially higher offer, the seller may begin questioning whether that buyer understands the risks.

Strategy 8: Be Patient and Let Competing Offers Fall Apart

Here's something I've seen happen over the years.

A buyer does the work.

They study the business.

They develop a sensible offer.

They explain their qualifications.

They propose terms that protect both parties.

And the seller chooses someone else.

Perhaps the competing buyer offered more money.

Maybe they promised a faster closing.

Or perhaps the seller simply preferred their proposal.

That can be disappointing.

But it doesn't necessarily mean the opportunity is gone forever.

Sometimes the winning buyer discovers problems during due diligence.

Their lender refuses to approve the financing.

They realize the debt payments will be too high.

Or they begin questioning the optimistic assumptions behind their offer.

The transaction falls apart.

And several months later, the seller contacts the original buyer again.

Why a Strong Backup Offer Can Still Win

If your offer was financially sound and professionally presented, the seller may remember it.

They may recognize that your proposal was more realistic than the one they initially accepted.

And now they may be more interested in certainty than the highest possible price.

This is one reason I encourage buyers to remain disciplined.

Don't increase your offer beyond what makes sense simply because you're afraid of losing the opportunity.

A deal that doesn't work at your price may not be worth winning.

And a seller who initially rejects your offer may reconsider if the competing transaction fails.

Patience can be a competitive advantage.

The SBA Loan Challenge for American Business Buyers

There's a particular challenge for buyers in the United States.

The SBA 7(a) loan program can allow eligible acquisitions to be financed with substantial leverage, sometimes leaving buyers with relatively modest equity requirements.

That can make it possible for buyers to offer sellers the full purchase price in cash at closing.

From the seller's perspective, this can be attractive.

They receive their money and don't need to worry about collecting seller-financing payments later.

But from the buyer's perspective, a fully cash-at-closing transaction can create problems.

If the seller receives the entire purchase price immediately, they no longer have the same financial incentive to support the buyer's success.

That's especially important for an individual buying their first business.

Why I Prefer Meaningful Seller Financing

When you purchase a business, the seller often has knowledge you need.

They understand the customers.

They know the employees.

They've developed relationships with suppliers.

And they may possess important operational knowledge that isn't written down anywhere.

You want the seller to be motivated to help you through the transition.

A meaningful seller-financing arrangement can help align interests.

The seller still has money at stake.

They benefit when the buyer operates successfully and makes the scheduled payments.

This doesn't guarantee a smooth transition.

But it can create an additional incentive for cooperation.

Of course, SBA financing and seller notes are subject to lender requirements and applicable program rules.

The appropriate structure will depend on the transaction.

The broader point is that a seller's preferred all-cash offer isn't necessarily the safest structure for the buyer.

And that's why I encourage buyers to think carefully before offering 100% of the purchase price in cash at closing.

Private Equity Buyers and Individual Buyers Need Different Deal Structures

Another important distinction involves the buyer's ability to operate the business after closing.

A large strategic buyer or private equity-backed organization may already have experienced managers and operating systems.

They may be able to take control of a company without depending heavily on the seller.

That changes their negotiating position.

An individual buyer may have a different situation.

If you're buying your first business, you may need the seller's help during the transition.

You might rely on them for training, introductions, operational guidance, and the transfer of important relationships.

That means your relationship with the seller doesn't necessarily end at closing.

It may continue for months or years.

And if the seller is financing part of the acquisition, the financial relationship could last even longer.

I've seen seller notes extending ten or twelve years.

So you need to consider not only whether you can negotiate a good price, but also whether you're building a relationship that supports your success after the transaction.

An aggressive negotiation strategy that leaves the seller feeling mistreated may work for a buyer who doesn't need ongoing cooperation.

But it can create serious problems for an individual buyer who depends on the seller for a successful transition.

The Day Two Problem: What Happens After You Buy the Business?

I frequently talk about what I call the Day Two Problem.

On the first day, you've completed the acquisition.

The documents are signed.

The ownership has transferred.

Congratulations.

But what happens on the second day?

You need to operate the business.

You have employees to manage.

Customers to serve.

Suppliers to pay.

Equipment to maintain.

And acquisition debt payments to make.

If the business doesn't generate enough cash flow to meet those obligations, you've got a problem.

You may have to cut expenses, inject more capital, or attempt a turnaround.

And remember why many people choose to buy an existing business in the first place.

They want to reduce the uncertainty associated with starting a company from scratch.

If you overpay and immediately need to rescue the business financially, you've undermined one of the main reasons for buying it.

A Business Should Produce Cash Flow, Not Consume Your Savings

Before submitting an offer, ask yourself:

  • Can the business comfortably service the proposed acquisition debt?

  • Will it generate enough money to pay me appropriately for my work?

  • Can it maintain necessary equipment and working capital?

  • Can I preserve the employees and operating systems required for success?

  • Is there enough financial flexibility if revenue declines?

  • Will the seller have appropriate incentives to support the transition?

If the answer to these questions is no, you may need to change the price or terms.

And if the seller won't accept a structure that works, walking away may be the right decision.

Why Walking Away Can Be a Successful Outcome

This is one of the most important lessons I want prospective business buyers to understand.

You don't need to complete an acquisition just because you've started searching.

You don't need to buy a company by a particular date.

And you certainly don't need to win every competitive bidding situation.

As I explain:

"Avoiding a bad deal and keeping your money is a successful outcome of a negotiation to buy a business or a search." —David C. Barnett

Think about that.

You may spend months investigating opportunities.

You may make several offers.

You may lose deals to competing buyers.

But if those deals wouldn't have generated sufficient cash flow, you've protected your capital.

That's a positive outcome.

Set the Right Goal for Your Business Search

Instead of saying:

I want to buy a business by the end of this year.

A better goal would be:

I want to buy a profitable, cash-flowing business that I'm qualified to manage, at a price and under terms that make financial sense.

That's a much more useful objective.

Especially if you're purchasing your first business and planning to leave employment to operate it.

Your first acquisition needs to fit your financial circumstances, experience, and risk tolerance.

I sometimes describe this as finding the Goldilocks business.

It needs to be the right business, at the right price, with the right terms.

That may take longer than you initially expect.

But rushing into a poor acquisition can be far more expensive than continuing your search.

Make Time Work in Your Favor While Searching for a Business

If you're employed while searching for a business, use that time strategically.

Continue developing your professional skills.

Learn about business financial statements.

Study acquisition financing.

Improve your ability to evaluate operations.

Build relationships in industries that interest you.

And keep saving money.

Every month you continue working and saving, your financial position may improve.

Your acquisition fund becomes larger.

Your experience grows.

And you may become a more credible buyer.

That means time can work in your favor.

Instead of feeling pressured to complete an acquisition quickly, you can become more selective.

You're building the resources and knowledge necessary to recognize a good opportunity when it appears.

And when you eventually find the right business, you'll be better prepared to act.

Final Thoughts: You Don't Need the Highest Offer to Buy the Right Business

When you're competing to buy a small business, it's easy to focus on the purchase price.

But the seller may be considering much more.

They're evaluating the likelihood of closing.

They're thinking about what happens to their employees.

They're considering whether the business will continue operating successfully.

And if seller financing is involved, they're evaluating whether they can trust you to make future payments.

These concerns create opportunities for buyers who may not have the largest amount of money available.

You can build credibility through relevant experience.

You can ask better questions and understand the seller's goals.

You can develop a realistic financing plan.

You can structure seller financing to address the seller's needs.

You can demonstrate how your offer supports the company's ongoing operations.

And you can show that you've carefully considered what will happen after closing.

Most importantly, you can remain disciplined.

The goal isn't to beat every competing buyer. The goal is to acquire a business that will support your future rather than put it at risk.

As I explain:

"You don't need to win the auction. You need a business that survives." —David C. Barnett

Sometimes that means making an offer below the highest bid.

Sometimes it means waiting for another transaction to fall apart.

And sometimes it means walking away entirely.

All three can be good outcomes when you're protecting your money and making thoughtful acquisition decisions.

Learn How to Buy a Small Business the Right Way

If you're serious about buying an existing business, I encourage you to learn the acquisition process before making offers.

My Business Buyer Advantage program provides online training, group coaching, and consulting services designed to help prospective buyers understand valuation, financing, due diligence, negotiation, and transaction structure.

The goal is to help you recognize good opportunities, control risk, and avoid expensive mistakes.

Explore Business Buyer Advantage

If you're a business owner thinking about selling, my Exit Ready resources can help you clarify your financial, business, and personal goals before going to market.

You can also explore my business selling resources, including guidance on preparing your company for sale and understanding what buyers look for.

Visit How to Sell My Own Business

If you'd like to better understand how buyers and sellers should think about the value of a company and its assets, explore my book Business and Asset Values: How Owners, Buyers, Sellers, Lenders, and Advisors Should Think About Small Business & Equipment Value.

Learn More About Business and Asset Values

For more videos, articles, and resources about buying, selling, financing, and managing small and medium-sized businesses, visit my website.

Visit DavidCBarnett.com

👉 Want deeper dives like this? Join my email list at DavidCBarnettList.com for insights, early access to videos, and 7 free bonus gifts.

Saturday, January 24, 2026

My House Offer Was Accepted — Now the Bank Wants an Appraisal

 After submitting 34 sealed bids, one of my offers on a surplus military house here in Moncton was finally accepted. https://youtu.be/ysGfHbm4nfo 



For anyone who hasn’t been following along:

A military base closed here a couple of years ago, and the government put all the former military family homes (PMQs) up for sale. These are four-bedroom houses located just a couple of blocks from where I already live, close to my kids’ school and in the same neighborhood where my ex-wife lives so from a personal and logistical standpoint, it’s an ideal location for me.


Because the homes were sold through a sealed tender process, the bank treats this as a private sale, which adds an extra requirement to the mortgage approval.


Inspection Done. Mortgage Approved. One More Hurdle.


The inspection went fine.


I met with the banker and the mortgage is fully approved conditional on an appraisal.


Since this wasn’t a normal MLS transaction, the bank wants an independent appraiser to confirm that the value supports the loan amount.


Honestly, I wasn’t worried. I got a very good deal on the property, and I fully expected the appraised value to come in higher than what I’m paying.


Good News from the Appraiser


He told me he has already appraised two other houses with the exact same layout in the same military housing area and both of those came in at over $100,000, which is well above my purchase price.


So from the bank’s point of view, there shouldn’t be any issue at all with the mortgage conditions.


I’m still curious to see the final written appraisal, so I’ll be asking my banker for a copy once it’s available, and I’ll share what happens next.


Closing Date May Move Up

So things are moving along faster than expected, which is fine by me.


Want deeper dives like this?
👉 Join my email list at DavidCBarnettList.com for early access to videos, insights, and 7 free bonus gifts.


Wednesday, January 21, 2026

Seller’s Lawyer Killed the Deal (What Went Wrong?)

 

Lawyer Killed the Business Sale? How to Prevent Legal Disputes From Destroying Your Deal

Imagine spending months working toward the sale of a small business.

You've found a serious buyer. The seller is interested. Due diligence is progressing, and both parties appear to agree on the major terms.

Everything seems to be moving toward closing.

Then the lawyers get involved.

Suddenly, there's a disagreement about when the final purchase agreement should be negotiated. Deadlines begin approaching. The buyer becomes concerned about losing their deposit, and the seller starts questioning whether the transaction should happen at all.

Eventually, the entire deal collapses.

That's the situation described in a Reddit post from a business broker who believed the seller's lawyer had ruined a transaction.

The broker also contacted me through LinkedIn and pointed me toward the discussion.

After reviewing the story, I think there's a lot more to learn here than simply blaming one attorney.

The real problem may have involved the structure of the Letter of Intent (LOI), how the transaction was managed, and whether the parties had the right legal advisors involved.

Let's examine what happened, what may have gone wrong, and how business buyers, sellers, and brokers can reduce the risk of experiencing the same problem.


The Business Sale That Fell Apart Over a Share Purchase Agreement

The story came from a post in Reddit's business broker community titled Lawyer Just Killed a Deal.

According to the broker, the transaction had been progressing smoothly.

The buyer wanted to purchase the business.

Due diligence appeared satisfactory.

Both sides seemed aligned on the transaction.

The proposed acquisition was structured as a share purchase, meaning the buyer would acquire shares of the company rather than purchasing selected business assets.

The Letter of Intent included a condition requiring both parties to agree on the final Share Purchase Agreement (SPA) before the buyer removed the conditions.

This was important because the buyer's deposit would become non-refundable once those conditions were waived.

The buyer wanted to know exactly what they were agreeing to before putting that money at risk.

That sounds reasonable, doesn't it?

The Seller's Lawyer Refused to Negotiate Before Conditions Were Removed

The buyer's lawyer drafted the Share Purchase Agreement and sent it to the seller's lawyer.

That's when the disagreement began.

According to the broker, the seller's lawyer refused to negotiate the SPA until after the buyer removed the conditions.

Think about what that meant.

The buyer was being asked to make their deposit non-refundable before knowing whether the final binding purchase agreement would contain acceptable terms.

Share purchase agreements can be complicated documents.

They often include representations, warranties, indemnities, closing obligations, and other provisions that can materially affect the parties' rights and responsibilities.

I've seen purchase agreements that were twenty pages long.

I've also seen agreements that were a hundred pages long.

These are not documents you should agree to without understanding their contents.

The buyer understandably didn't want to waive the condition before the final agreement was settled.

Meanwhile, the seller's lawyer continued insisting that the conditions be removed first.

The transaction stalled.

Then, on the deadline for removing the conditions, the seller announced that something didn't feel right and decided not to proceed.

The deal died.

The broker was understandably frustrated.

But was the lawyer entirely responsible?

I'm not convinced we have enough information to say that.

Problem #1: The LOI Created an Unnecessary Deadline Trap

Let's start with the Letter of Intent.

When I worked as a business broker, and when I teach people how to buy businesses through Business Buyer Advantage, I generally recommend beginning with a non-binding offer or agreement, with appropriately drafted exceptions for any provisions intended to be binding.

Why?

Because buying a business involves significant investigation and negotiation.

The buyer needs an opportunity to evaluate the company.

Financing may need to be arranged.

And the final legal documentation must be negotiated.

In the Reddit story, the LOI included conditions covering these matters.

But there was one important structural problem.

The agreement established a deadline when the conditions had to be removed, after which the deposit would become non-refundable.

That structure resembles what we often see in residential real estate transactions.

For example, a buyer might have ten days to complete a home inspection.

Once the inspection condition is removed, the transaction proceeds under the agreed contract.

But buying a business is different.

The final legal documentation can be considerably more complicated.

And sometimes the parties need additional time to work through the details.

Why I Would Separate the Conditions

Here's how I approached this when I was a business broker.

I would establish specific deadlines for certain activities.

For example:

  • A defined period for completing financial and operational due diligence

  • A deadline for arranging financing, where applicable

  • Timeframes for other agreed investigations or approvals

But I would treat approval of the final purchase documentation differently.

The transaction would remain subject to both parties and their legal advisors agreeing on the final documents.

That condition wouldn't necessarily disappear simply because the due diligence deadline had passed.

This distinction is important.

The buyer might complete due diligence and decide the business is acceptable.

But if the lawyers subsequently discover that they cannot agree on essential contractual terms, the buyer should not automatically lose their deposit merely because the earlier investigation period has expired.

Of course, the precise rights and obligations depend on how the agreement is drafted and the applicable law.

That's why the structure needs to be established carefully with qualified legal advisors.

Why Buyer Confidence Matters

When I was working with business sellers, I regularly emphasized the importance of making buyers feel comfortable proceeding.

As I explained:

"we have to make it absolutely certain that they understand that their deposit money is never at risk" —David C. Barnett

That reflects the buyer-protective approach I preferred in structuring transactions.

It doesn't mean every deposit in every business acquisition is legally refundable.

The agreement must expressly establish the relevant rights and conditions.

The principle is that buyers need to understand their financial exposure before committing to the transaction.

If they believe they're being forced into an uncertain legal arrangement, they may decide not to make an offer or proceed with the deal.

Problem #2: The Business Broker Lost Control of the Transaction Process

The next issue concerns the broker's role.

One thing that stood out to me in the Reddit story was how the communication appeared to be happening.

The buyer's lawyer drafted the Share Purchase Agreement.

The document went to the seller's lawyer.

The seller's lawyer then communicated with the seller.

And the broker seemed to be learning about the resulting problems after they developed.

Now, we don't know every conversation that took place.

The broker may have been more involved than the Reddit post suggests.

But the story raises an important question.

Who was coordinating the transaction and making sure everyone understood what needed to happen next?

When I worked as a business broker, I considered that coordination a central part of my job.

Why I Preferred to Coordinate Communication Between the Lawyers

In the transactions I handled, I usually had direct contact with the buyer, seller, and both parties' legal advisors.

I would discuss the LOI with the lawyers and help establish expectations for the work ahead.

I also preferred to review draft purchase agreements before they were circulated between the legal teams.

Some lawyers initially found that approach unusual.

But after working with me, many came to appreciate the efficiency.

The reason was simple.

I wanted to catch obvious differences between the LOI and the draft agreement before those differences created unnecessary negotiations.

This wasn't about replacing the lawyers or providing legal advice.

It was about managing the business terms and keeping the transaction organized.

The lawyers remained responsible for advising their respective clients and negotiating the legal protections.

Problem #3: The Purchase Agreement Might Not Match the LOI

Here's something that surprises many first-time business buyers.

Lawyers don't necessarily draft every purchase agreement from a blank page.

They often begin with an existing template or precedent document.

That's perfectly understandable.

Business purchase agreements contain many recurring provisions, and using an established starting point can save time.

But it also creates opportunities for mistakes.

The Problem With Boilerplate Contracts

I've seen agreements containing provisions that didn't relate to the actual transaction.

Why?

Because the lawyer started with a template and didn't remove everything that was irrelevant.

I've even encountered draft agreements containing the names of companies from other transactions.

That happens when someone reuses an earlier document and doesn't update it completely.

The bigger problem is that a standard template may contain terms that differ from what the buyer and seller agreed upon in their LOI.

And if nobody identifies those differences early, they can lead to unnecessary disagreements.

How I Reviewed Draft Purchase Agreements

My approach was straightforward.

First, the buyer's lawyer would prepare the initial agreement.

Then I would compare it with the LOI.

I would look for obvious inconsistencies involving matters such as:

  • Purchase price and payment terms

  • Seller financing arrangements

  • Assets or shares being transferred

  • Closing conditions

  • Transition and training commitments

  • Other commercial terms previously negotiated

If something appeared inconsistent, I would raise it with the drafting lawyer.

Once the business terms appeared aligned, the document could move forward for the seller's legal review.

Again, this was a commercial consistency check.

It wasn't a substitute for legal review, and the broker should never interfere with a lawyer's professional judgment or a client's ability to obtain independent legal advice.

The objective was to identify avoidable problems before they turned into expensive disputes.

Problem #4: The Seller May Have Been Confused About What Was Happening

Now let's consider the seller's perspective.

According to the Reddit post, the seller became increasingly emotional, confused, and stressed as the lawyers disagreed.

That isn't surprising.

Selling a business can be one of the largest financial transactions of someone's life.

The owner may have spent decades building the company.

They may be retiring or making a major lifestyle change.

And now they're hearing conflicting information about deadlines, deposits, conditions, and legal agreements.

Without clear communication, that situation can become overwhelming.

Why Setting Expectations Matters

Imagine a more coordinated process.

The broker has reviewed the draft agreement for consistency with the LOI.

The buyer's lawyer has addressed the commercial discrepancies identified.

The broker then informs the seller that the draft is ready for the seller's lawyer to review.

The seller understands what stage the transaction has reached.

They know the legal advisor is being asked to examine the document, identify concerns, and provide advice about the proposed terms.

That doesn't eliminate disagreements.

But it gives everyone a clearer understanding of the process.

The broker can help explain the commercial context while the lawyer advises the seller on the legal implications.

When those roles are properly coordinated, there's less opportunity for confusion.

Why the Broker Needs to Be the Transaction Coordinator

As I explain:

"the broker really is supposed to be the quarterback in managing all this stuff." —David C. Barnett

That doesn't mean the broker should control the lawyers' independent advice or prevent direct lawyer-to-lawyer communication when it is needed.

It means someone needs to keep track of the transaction's progress, outstanding commercial issues, responsibilities, and deadlines.

The broker is often well positioned to coordinate those activities.

Without that coordination, relatively small disagreements can become major obstacles.

And when the parties are already under emotional pressure, those obstacles can threaten the entire transaction.

Problem #5: The Parties May Have Hired Lawyers Without the Right Experience

The Reddit broker concluded that the seller's lawyer may have approached the business sale too much like a real estate transaction.

That raises a broader issue.

Not every lawyer has the same experience with small business acquisitions.

A lawyer may be excellent at residential real estate transactions.

They may have helped you purchase a home, prepare a will, or handle a rental property.

But that doesn't automatically mean they're experienced in negotiating share purchase agreements or complex business acquisitions.

These transactions can involve specialized issues.

For example, a share purchase may require careful consideration of the company's existing liabilities, representations and warranties, indemnification provisions, and other legal risks.

An asset purchase may involve different questions about which assets and obligations are being transferred.

The structure matters.

And the legal advisor should understand it.

Why Familiarity Isn't Enough

Many business owners choose lawyers based on existing relationships.

They've worked with someone before.

They trust them.

And they assume that person can handle the business sale.

Sometimes that's perfectly reasonable.

But in other situations, the lawyer may not regularly work on acquisitions.

That lack of familiarity can lead to delays, unnecessary disagreements, or missed issues.

For a transaction that may represent the seller's retirement savings or the buyer's largest investment, choosing an appropriate legal advisor is important.

How to Choose the Right Lawyer for a Small Business Acquisition

In my Exit Ready program, I provide business owners with guidance on evaluating business brokers before hiring one.

That includes using a structured interview process to understand the broker's experience and capabilities.

I think business brokers could apply a similar approach to helping clients evaluate legal advisors.

For example, a broker could prepare a guide explaining what buyers and sellers should look for when hiring a business transaction lawyer.

The guide could include questions like these.

Questions to Ask Before Hiring a Business Transaction Lawyer

1. How many small business acquisitions or sales have you handled in the past year?

You want to understand whether business transactions are a regular part of the lawyer's practice.

2. How often do you represent buyers versus sellers?

Experience on both sides can help a lawyer understand the competing concerns involved in negotiating a transaction.

3. How many share purchases and asset purchases have you handled?

These transaction structures involve different considerations.

Relevant experience matters.

4. What is your process for reviewing an LOI and preparing the final purchase agreement?

This can help reveal how the lawyer approaches negotiations and manages the transition from preliminary terms to binding documents.

5. How do you coordinate with business brokers, accountants, lenders, and other advisors?

A business acquisition often involves multiple professionals.

Clear communication between them is important.

6. How do you identify and resolve disagreements without unnecessarily delaying the transaction?

You want an advisor who can protect your interests while also helping you understand the practical implications of different options.

7. What legal work is likely to be required, and how are your fees structured?

Legal costs can increase when negotiations become prolonged.

Understanding the expected scope and billing arrangements can help avoid surprises.

8. Have you handled transactions of a similar size and complexity?

A lawyer experienced primarily in very large corporate acquisitions may not necessarily approach a small owner-operated business sale in the most practical way.

The objective isn't simply to hire the lawyer with the most impressive credentials.

It's to find someone whose experience fits the transaction you're trying to complete.

How Business Brokers Can Help Clients Select Legal Advisors

When I was working as a business broker in Moncton, I regularly dealt with several local lawyers.

Over time, I developed a sense of who had experience with these transactions and who was easier to work with.

When clients asked for recommendations, I could provide several names for them to consider.

Today, the market is changing.

Buyers and sellers increasingly participate in transactions involving people in different cities or regions.

Some lawyers now market their business acquisition services across much larger geographic areas.

That means buyers and sellers may have more options.

But it also makes evaluating the advisor's qualifications important.

A broker who provides clients with a structured attorney-selection guide could help them ask better questions and make more informed decisions.

The final choice of legal advisor should remain with the client.

And each party needs independent advice appropriate to their interests.

Could the Seller Have Used the Lawyer to Escape the Deal?

There's another possibility worth discussing.

What if the seller had already decided they didn't want to sell?

The Reddit post says the seller ultimately withdrew because the situation didn't feel right.

That may have been a genuine emotional reaction to the legal disagreement.

But it's also possible the seller had developed doubts earlier.

We simply don't know.

I've encountered situations where a party wanted to withdraw from a transaction but was reluctant to say so directly.

Sometimes the legal process becomes the place where those concerns surface.

Why a Seller Might Not Want to Withdraw Directly

Depending on the listing agreement, a seller might face contractual consequences for withdrawing a business from the market while an active offer exists.

There could be provisions dealing with fees or compensation owed to the broker.

The exact consequences would depend on the agreement.

That creates a possible incentive for a seller to avoid being the person who openly ends the transaction.

In some circumstances, an advisor may be asked to take a negotiating position that makes the transaction difficult to complete.

I'm not saying that's what happened in this Reddit story.

There isn't enough evidence to establish that.

But it's one possible explanation for why the seller's lawyer appeared unwilling to negotiate the final agreement before the condition deadline.

Why You Shouldn't Automatically Blame the Lawyer

A lawyer's position may reflect legal advice, instructions from their client, or concerns that aren't fully described in a third-party account.

We don't have the complete LOI.

We don't have the correspondence between the lawyers.

And we don't know everything the seller was thinking.

So blaming the attorney alone may overlook the real problem.

The more useful question is how the transaction could have been structured and coordinated to reduce the chances of this situation developing.

Two Changes I Would Make to Prevent This From Happening Again

If I were advising the broker who shared this story, I would focus on two practical improvements.

1. Help Clients Choose Lawyers With Relevant Business Transaction Experience

Don't assume that every lawyer is equally familiar with small business acquisitions.

Create a structured guide that helps buyers and sellers evaluate potential legal advisors.

Encourage them to ask about experience with share purchases, asset purchases, due diligence, purchase agreements, and transaction coordination.

This can reduce the risk of delays caused by unfamiliarity with the process.

It also helps clients understand why selecting the right legal advisor matters.

2. Separate Due Diligence Deadlines From Final Agreement Approval

This is the structural change I consider especially important.

A buyer can have a defined period to complete due diligence.

They can also have a deadline to arrange financing.

But approval of the final purchase documentation can be treated as a separate condition.

That way, completing due diligence doesn't automatically mean the buyer must accept legal terms that haven't been negotiated.

The agreement should clearly establish what happens to the deposit if the parties cannot agree on the final documentation.

As I mentioned earlier, the precise drafting must be handled by qualified legal advisors.

There are legitimate competing concerns here.

A seller may not want to remain committed indefinitely while a buyer continues negotiating.

And a buyer needs protection against being forced to accept unacceptable legal terms.

The goal is to establish a process that manages both parties' risks without creating an unnecessary deadline trap.

Why This Matters for Both Buyers and Sellers

It's easy to view a failed transaction as simply a disagreement between two parties.

But the consequences can be significant.

For the buyer, a failed deal may mean lost time, legal expenses, due diligence costs, and a missed opportunity.

For the seller, it may mean restarting the sale process after months of negotiations.

The business may have experienced disruption.

Employees may have become concerned.

And the owner may be forced to delay retirement or another important life decision.

That's why transaction management matters.

A good business sale process isn't simply about finding a buyer and agreeing on a price.

It's about moving the transaction from initial agreement to closing while controlling risk.

That requires appropriate legal advice, clearly structured conditions, organized communication, and realistic expectations.

The Hidden Cost of Poor Communication Between Advisors

Legal costs can become substantial when advisors repeatedly exchange drafts containing unresolved commercial disagreements.

Imagine a buyer's lawyer preparing a purchase agreement using standard provisions.

The seller's lawyer reviews it and identifies several terms that don't match the LOI.

They respond with revisions.

The buyer's lawyer reviews those revisions.

Then another draft is prepared.

Each exchange takes time.

And each lawyer may be billing for that work.

Some negotiation is unavoidable and necessary.

But unnecessary discrepancies between the LOI and the purchase agreement can often be identified earlier.

That's one reason I preferred to review the commercial terms before the legal teams became involved in extensive back-and-forth negotiations.

The goal wasn't to eliminate legal scrutiny.

It was to make the process more efficient.

A well-coordinated transaction can help everyone focus on the issues that genuinely require negotiation.

What Buyers Should Do Before Removing Conditions

If you're purchasing a business, don't treat condition removal as a minor administrative step.

Before waiving conditions, you need to understand what you're agreeing to and what happens afterward.

In particular, make sure you and your lawyer have addressed the following:

  1. The final agreement: Have the essential purchase terms and legal protections been agreed upon, or is approval of the final documentation still an outstanding condition?

  2. The deposit: Under what circumstances does it become non-refundable, and what happens if the transaction cannot close?

  3. Due diligence: Have you completed the investigations necessary to understand the business and its risks?

  4. Financing: Are the necessary funds available, and have any required financing conditions been satisfied?

  5. Closing obligations: What must each party do before the transaction can be completed?

  6. Remaining contingencies: Are there unresolved issues that could prevent closing or create additional financial exposure?

The answers will depend on the transaction documents and applicable law.

But the principle is straightforward.

Don't waive contractual protections without understanding the consequences.

Your lawyer should help you evaluate those risks before you make a binding commitment.

Final Thoughts: Don't Let a Poorly Managed Process Kill a Good Business Deal

The Reddit story raises an interesting question.

Did the seller's lawyer kill the deal?

Maybe the lawyer contributed to the breakdown.

Maybe the seller got cold feet.

Or maybe the transaction was structured in a way that created unnecessary pressure at exactly the wrong moment.

We don't have enough information to know for certain.

But there are lessons here for anyone buying or selling a small business.

The LOI needs to establish a sensible path toward closing.

The buyer shouldn't be forced into unreasonable uncertainty about the final agreement and deposit.

Both parties should have legal advisors who understand the type of transaction involved.

And someone needs to coordinate the process so that commercial disagreements don't turn into avoidable crises.

As I explain:

"a lot of the time that lawyers spend in going back and forth with each other can be avoided if the paperwork actually matches the LOI to start with." —David C. Barnett

That's one of the biggest takeaways from this situation.

Good transaction management doesn't eliminate every disagreement.

But it can prevent unnecessary problems from becoming deal-killers.

And when you're dealing with the sale of a business that someone has spent years building, that's worth taking seriously.

Get Help Buying or Selling a Small Business

If you're preparing to sell your business, my team and I can help you understand the process before you meet your first buyer.

Through our zero-commission business selling program, we can help you understand what your business may be worth, prepare the information package buyers need, run confidential advertising, and coordinate the selling process.

You can also explore my Exit Ready program and the second edition of my book, How to Sell My Own Business, to learn more about preparing for a successful exit.

Explore How to Sell My Own Business

If you're planning to buy a business, my Business Buyer Advantage program provides online training, group coaching, and consulting services covering the acquisition process.

Learn how to evaluate opportunities, structure offers, manage due diligence, and understand the risks involved before committing your money.

Explore Business Buyer Advantage

For more articles, videos, and educational resources about buying, selling, financing, and managing small and medium-sized businesses, visit my website.

Visit DavidCBarnett.com

If you're interested in the financial side of business transactions, including how owners, buyers, sellers, lenders, and advisors should think about company and equipment values, explore my book Business and Asset Values.

Learn More About Business and Asset Values

And if you'd like more practical insights about small business acquisitions and dealmaking, join my email list for updates, stories, and 7 free gifts.

Join David C. Barnett's Email List

Monday, January 19, 2026

Live Credit Card Points for biz owners with Guest Ross Alcorn

 


Max out those FREE vacations with your business purchases- Guest Ross Alcorn New Livestream guest- Ross Alcorn I’m happy to have Ross join me on a live broadcast. He’s been helping small business owners game the credit card system for years. He’s literally built a business out of coaching owners and training their A/P staff on this. Tune in and as we’ll be discussing how to max out credit card points and other benefits with your business spending. This is a ‘must see event’ for anyone who owns or will own a small business. Find Ross online here: https://itineraryboss.com/ Special Xero offer: Get 90% off for 6 months using this link: https://referrals.xero.com/DavidCBarnett_xero . Terms & Conditions apply.* See the video of my Xero story here: https://youtu.be/LfaGUfwStqo Sign up for David's email list at https://www.DavidCBarnettList.com Youtube music licensing code: 5PJWQOE5ZZHTQSRY

Saturday, January 17, 2026

The Easiest Financing Source Most Buyers Forget to Ask For

 When financing falls apart on a deal, it’s often not because the numbers don’t work — it’s because people overlook the simplest source of capital available: the seller.

I recently had an interesting phone call with an equipment leasing broker who specializes in arranging operating and capital leases for heavy equipment, restaurant equipment, and store fixtures. https://youtu.be/LH3FdgmywrA 



He was working on a deal involving a small specialty food store that was shutting down. The business had reached the end of its lease, and all of the equipment was still installed in the space — display cases, coolers, counters, baskets, trays, and all kinds of small items.

A successful food operator in a neighboring town wanted to expand into this location. The brand was strong, the operator had decades of experience, and the opportunity made sense because much of the infrastructure was already in place. Expanding into a fully equipped space dramatically reduces startup costs and risk.

Where the Financing Hit a Wall

The leasing broker was able to arrange financing on all of the major equipment — anything with serial numbers such as refrigerated display cases, freezers, and likely the point-of-sale system.

But the smaller items created a problem.

Trays, baskets, scoops, and small fixtures don’t have serial numbers. They’re easy to move, hard to track, and not permanently attached to the building. From a lender’s perspective, these items don’t make good collateral. If the bank ever had to seize them, they could literally walk out the back door.

As a result, no lender wanted to finance that portion of the equipment package.

The buyer was already going to be stretched putting up the cash for inventory, so the broker called me asking if I had any ideas for how to finance that last piece of the deal.

Installation Value Changes Everything

This immediately reminded me of concepts I use when performing machinery and equipment appraisals — specifically the difference between:

  • Fair market value in continued use, and

  • Fair market value removed (liquidation value).

For many pieces of equipment, a huge portion of the value isn’t the metal itself — it’s the installation.

Think about a large refrigerated cooler. It might be manufactured overseas, shipped, delivered, installed, wired by electricians, and connected to compressors and plumbing. All of that labor and logistics add enormous value.

If the equipment stays in place and continues operating, that value is preserved.

If it gets removed, much of that value disappears instantly.

Once it’s disconnected, hauled away, stored, and eventually sold, you’re now dealing with a fraction of its original value.

The Simple Solution: Seller Financing

My suggestion to the leasing broker was straightforward.

If the big equipment can be financed through leasing companies, then the seller should finance the smaller items directly, just like vendor financing in a business sale.

Even though this isn’t technically goodwill, the seller is protecting the installation value of the equipment. If the deal collapses and the equipment has to be removed, the seller faces storage, transport, and resale losses. The buyer, on the other hand, receives maximum value by keeping everything in place and operational.

By holding a note on the smaller equipment, the seller:

  • Protects the value of what they already own

  • Makes the transaction possible

  • Often achieves a higher total recovery than liquidation would provide

From the buyer’s perspective, it reduces the upfront cash burden and keeps the expansion financially manageable.

Why People Rarely Think of This

One of the most surprising things I’ve observed over the years is how rarely people think of simply asking the seller to finance part of a deal.

It’s often the easiest source of financing available.

If someone owns the assets outright, they can decide to accept payments over time simply by agreeing to it. There’s no bank committee, no rigid underwriting, and no collateral hurdles.

In many cases, seller financing creates a win-win outcome that wouldn’t exist otherwise.

Want deeper dives like this?


👉 Join my email list at DavidCBarnettList.com for early access to videos, insights, and 7 free bonus gifts.